Brieya Walker 11/13/18 WEEK 12 Aja Monet, Mobilizing a Movement of the Mind.

For this blog post I decided to reflect on Aja Monet’s spoken word “Mobilizing a Movement of the Mind”. I believe that the main idea of  this poem was to reflect on how far we’ve come in society and realize how much times have changed. She mentions how presently we rely on gadgets and devices and everything is mobilized. The line that stuck out to me most is when she said “we photograph moments best kept in photo albums of our memory and upload them into society.” I recently had this discussion with one of my friends about how our generation don’t invest in photo albums. Our parents, grandparents, and all of the other previous generations made sure to have photo albums filled with pictures of important milestones, family gatherings, and just images of us just growing up.  I feel like since smartphones came around nobody feels the need to anymore because they can store every image in their phone. The only issue is what if you lose your phone? all of those memories are gone. After that conversation I made the decision that I’m going to start printing out the pictures that I have in my phone and buy a little photo album to put them in. I don’t want to miss out on being able to look back on special moments I had.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxDiS0GWv2s

Brieya Walker 9/18/2018 WEEK 4 Marshall McLuhan, Understanding Media: the Extensions of Man

This week’s journal is about Marshall McLuhan’s, Understanding the Media.  In Chapter 1 of his book he discusses how the medium is the message. This phrase defined to mean that ” the personal and social consequences of any medium–that is, of any extension of ourselves–result from the new scale that is introduced into our affairs by each extension of ourselves, or by any technology.” (McLuhan, 23) Honestly speaking this definition alone was hard for me to analyze and figure it out as he used analogies I’ve grasped more of an understanding. For example, the first one he mention was the creation of automation. Automation being a form of technology and replacing the job of a human unfortunately eliminate jobs and this can be considered a negative effect of the creation. But on a positive note automation can create new roles for people. In result, many people will argue that it wasn’t the machine that was the issue but what they did with the automation machine that was the message. To summarize,  the impact of the medium itself is more significant than the content it carries. He also showed a concern in how society focuses more on the things that are obvious and how we sometimes miss the structural changes that occurs over long periods of time. We focus on the obvious of what it does and what it’s intended to do but we do become unaware of what it’s actually doing to us.

 

McLuhan, Marshall. Understanding Media: the Extensions of Man. The MIT Press, 2013.

Brieya Walker 9/11/2018 WEEK 3 Marie Battiste, Print Culture and Decolonizing the University

For this weekly response I’m reflecting on Print Culture and Decolonizing the University, written by Marie Battiste. This reading shares the history between Euro-Christian travelers/missionaries and the indigenous peoples. These travelers and missionaries completely transformed and tried to erase the history of their aboriginal literacy and claimed the Indians to be illiterate because they didn’t agree with or understand their ideographic and symbolic literacy. Aboriginal literacy relates to the spiritual, practical, public functions of symbolic literacy which includes their pictographs petroglyphs, notched sticks, ideographs, and wampum. I believe this reading successfully showed that any literacy process can work as long as people have a use for it because it shows how critical it was to many Indigenous societies. In addition, it mentions that many of the history taught regarding the indigenous people and the Europeans is very one sided and I one hundred percent agree with that. Reading this automatically made me think about a passage I read in an English class called American Identities. The passage basically spoke about how Indians were portrayed as savages, how they were always killing each other, and their excessive alcohol use, which all were true but we’re not taught why this occurred. This week’s reading made me think of this because this is another example of how the Europeans portrayed the Indigenous to be illiterate but in fact their culture influenced their own creations in several ways.

Marie Battiste. “Print Culture and Decolonizing the University: Indigenizing the Page: Part 1.” The Future of the Page . University of Toronto Press, 2004.

Week 6: Technology and War and Cybernetics, oh my!

For this weeks post I chose to read “As We May Think” by Vannevar Bush. Bush addresses problems that he believes scientists should be paying close attention to. Almost seeing the future in technology he raised the question of how machines can help our thinking process.

For example, “it is readily possible to construct a machine which will manipulate premises in accordance with formal logic.” Beyond the logic of the mathematician, lies the application of logic in everyday affairs, ”we may someday click off arguments on a machine with the same assurance that we now enter sales on a cash register.”

Michael Farias blog post for November 27

For this blog post I chose to write about to “Missed Connections” by Safiya Umoja Noble. This article talks about important things in life such as the Internet. The Internet is great but it is also making people lazy and sometimes even stupid. With the Internet at our disposal we can find out anything we want without having to do much work, which makes us lazy. This in a way is taking away the value of education because everything you need to learn can be found on the Internet. Noble talks about how the search engine of a computer can exploit women. She says that you could be looking up something about the history or culture of women and pornography will be the first thing that comes up. You weren’t looking for this but it is what your search engine gave you. That is not okay and needs to change.

Michael Farias blog post for November 20

For this blog post, I chose to write about “Database as a Symbolic Form” by Lev Manovich. In the article Lev talks about the term database and its symbolic meaning. He says that computer science defines database as “a structured collection of data” (Manovich 1). This is basically where everything that is done on the Internet is stored. He says that all of this data is stored in a specific order according to a hierarchy. This is something (like everything else on the Internet and media) that is overlooked. We never think about where and how everything that we put on a computer goes and is stored.

Milagros’ Post for 11/20

This week the article that we read was very interesting and made me think about Google. In the article, he mentions that he has trouble focusing and reading long articles or papers and that’s because he is aware that he spends a lot of time on Google and knowing that he gets a lot of information from Google and from a screen.  I think that the reason why I can’t ever focus on a reading unless its what I want to read is because I am constantly on social media, texting etc and always looking at a screen. I tend to get figgidty when I am reading a long piece of work or I’ll just read the words but not really understand it. Carr says “Once I was a scuba diver in the sea of words. Now I zip along the surface like a guy on a Jet Ski.” I definitely can relate to this because its just like skimming over the words but not really soaking and absorbing what is being said. When I wasn’t really on social media or too involved on my phone, I think I was more productive and understood lots more.  To this day when I am typing a paper or trying to focus on reading, I have to put my phone on do not disturb so I can just focus.

 

Work Cited

Carr, Nicholas. 2008. “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” The Atlantic. July 1. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/07/is-google-making-us-stupid/306868/.

Brieya Walker 11/20/2018 WEEK 13 Is Google Making Us Stupid by Nicholas Carr.

“Is Google Making Us Stupid” written by Nicholas Carr discusses many topics that I personally think are true. Not that it’s true for everyone, but for many, maintaining focus for a lengthy article or book has become difficult due to the increase in the use of the internet. With the web, everything is so easy to just click on and we can find what we’re looking for within seconds in contrast to reading a book where you actually have to sit and soak in all the words on the page. Over the last ten years we began to rely more on technology and the internet has become the “goto” of the information we consume where we now “power browse”. I think Carr’s concerns have been acknowledged and addressed but things have gotten worse. In the article it states, “In a 2004 interview with Newsweek, Brin said, ‘Certainly if you had all the world’s information directly attached to your brain, or an artificial brain that was smarter than your brain, you’d be better off.’ Last year, Page told a convention of scientists that Google is ‘really trying to build artificial intelligence and to do it on a large scale.’” (Carr, 2008) Adding artificial intelligence to the mix would have an even worse affect to our brains. Yes, these new technological advances are good as far as convenience, but what about challenging the mind and exercising our brains. If the web already has the possibility to lessen our attention spans what would an artificial brain do?

 

Carr, Nicholas. 2008. “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” The Atlantic. July 1. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/07/is-google-making-us-stupid/306868/.

Marisa Brincat Blog Post for 11/19

“When I conducted my classroom exercise this semester, Black Girls Rock!, a nonprofit dedicated to empowering young women of color, was ranked high on the first page results, showing that there are, indeed , alternatives to the usual search results.” (Noble, page 6)

After reading Noble’s piece, I came across this statement about how she started a nonprofit dedicated to empowering young women of color for her classroom exercise and she found that it ranked highly in search results as opposed to anything vulgar that might rank similar to the search. I think that by this statement she is stating how google tends to rank vulgar URLs high rather than other URLs. By seeing that her page was ranked high, she is stating how it is possible for Google to rank URLs that don’t necessarily have vulgar content and how she was able to see that Google can choose what they want to rank due to our digital democracy. Based off our our clicks, she also goes on to say how sexism and pornography are the most popular values on the internet when it comes to women and it is all due to us voting. This goes to show that it seems as if society are the culprits for vulgarity being so popular on the internet.

 

week 6

While reading Lisa Nakamuras Race In/For Cyberspace it brought up a lot of thoughts. this article reminded me of movies such as the matrix and surrogates. in both these movies people are taken to another world, which they control their appearance and identity in that world. similar to  the internet, where people can make a social media account and identify themselves as anyone or anything. a man can make a profile claiming to be a woman, while another person can claim to be a rich exciting person. although none of it is reality, its still the presentation that would lead naive users to believe this perception. we constantly see people presenting their lives as more than what it is. however, its hard to believe otherwise when a person does their best to maintain that image. through lies and deception, social media has become a fantasy world, for people to live the life they want but dont live. when people unplug from their imaginary lives, we expect them to be the same as online. but, we are disappointed when its not.