Jessica Colasacco Blog Post 2

For this weeks blog article, I decided to focus on Walter Ong’s “Orality and Literacy.” This article was interesting to be because Ong argues that the concept of writing “weakens the mind” and warns “those who use writing will become forgetful.” To me, this concept seems obscure because writing is such an integral part of today’s world. There is not one class in college that I have taken that did not have at least one paper due during the term of the class. Also, since I was a little kid, I have kept a journal in which I write down interesting things that happen in my life that I do not want to forget. To this day, I can go back and read those writings and remember exactly how I felt in that moment, which goes against Plato’s claim that writing would make people forgetful. I do agree with Plato’s claim that “written text is basically unresponsive.” When writing, someone is having a one worded conversation that cannot be debated, as opposed to having a conversation with someone, which allows someone else to interrupt and include their own opinions.

Sources:

Ong, Walter J. “Orality and Literacy” in The Book History Reader. eds. David Finkelstein, Alistair McCleery. Routledge, 2006.

Isaac Espinoza Week 2 Blog Post

For this week’s blog post I’ve decided to write about Diana Taylor’s “The Archive and the Repertoire”. While reading this I found myself relating to a lot of what she was discussing. Diana mentions in her work how she is a Mexican immigrant in a Canadian boarding school. She says during her time there “the training failed miserably” meaning she never fully adopted the Canadian culture. However, when she returned to Mexico City she didn’t quite feel Mexican nor Canadian. She was stuck somewhere in between which is how I feel most days. I was born and raised in New York City, however, I come from Ecuadorian parents that immigrated here shortly before I was born.  I’ve been to Ecuador several times and every time I come back I do so feeling more and more Ecuadorian.  These trips give me an opportunity to learn about my roots, spend time with my family, and open up about different ways of living. It is because of this that I don’t quite identify as American nor as Ecuadorian but actually as a little bit of both. I’m somewhere in the middle like Diana Taylor which allows me to see the world from a couple different perspectives.

Citation

Taylor, Diana. The Archive and the Repertoire: Performing Cultural Memory in the Americas. Duke University Press, 2007. pg. XV

Michael Farias Blog Post 2 “The Craft of Thought”

Michael Farias

 

For this blog post, I chose The Craft of Thought by Mary Carruthers. In her writing, Carruthers talks about memory, creating, and inventing. Carruthers says that when one invents, he or she is creating. Then further into the text she begins to talk about “inventory”. This term relates to memory because Carruthers defines it as “the storage of many diverse materials, but not into random storage” (Carruthers 11). Basically “inventory” is an organized group of innovative thoughts. Another quote that really stood out to me is when Carruthers says, “Having “inventory” is a requirement for “invention.” Not only does this statement assume that one cannot create (invent) without a memory store (inventory) to invent from and with, but it also assumes that one’s memory-store is effectively “inventoried,” that its matters are in readily-recovered “locations” (Carruthers 12). This quote says that our minds store different innovative thoughts or images into different parts of the mind. This is very interesting to me because it shows how complex the mind really is. Our minds store these inventories and are easily accessible when we want to use them.

 

Work Cited

 

Carruthers, Mary. “The Craft of Thought”. 1998.

Anthony Sierra 9/10/18 Week #2 Blog Post

This week’s blog post is focused mainly on Walter Ong’s Orality and Literacy Writing restructures consciousness.  In this passage Ong states that “Fourthly, in keeping with the agonistic mentality of oral cultures, Plato’s Socrates also holds it against writing that the written word cannot defend itself as the natural spoken word can…” This quote caught my attention because it highlights how something that is written could easily be misinterpreted. Something such as a news article or a tweet could be taken the wrong way and it could not defend itself because it isn’t anything but words on a page or a screen. It would be easier to clarify your point of view through “the natural spoken word” because it would be easier to communicate with. To use a real world example, arguing with someone via text message is way more harder than arguing with someone through phone calls or face to face. Your points don’t come off as strong and its easier to misinterpret each others point. I feel like the quote above still applies to society today, despite the advancements in technology.

Alassane Diop Week 2 9/10

For this weeks reading I looked at the article ORALITY AND LITERACY by Walter Ong. The article reflects on the idea that the technology of books and any written documentation is making humanity more “stupid”. The author sourced Plato in which he claims “writing destroys memory. Those who use writing will become forgetful, relying on an external resource for what they lack in internal resources”. To an extent I do I agree with Plato’s ideas. Hes saying that instead of us actual trying to use brain power to memorize and think of ideas and facts, we instead rely on what is already written down. Once those written documents are burned they are gone for ever unless someone can remember them. It is similar to calculators, some people believe they will cause society to worsen an individuals math skills.
But my argument is written statements hold information longer and once its written it can’t be changed unlike oral history. You can tell the same story multiple times but it may be subject to change and false info may be spread. Also it is more easier to learn more knowledge and makes it widespread to anyone that can pick the book and read.

Anthony Dyce 9/10 Blog 2

For this week’s blog post I decided to respond to Walter Ong ‘s “Orality and Literacy”. I found this reading to be very intriguing because Ong stresses the importance of writing in correlation with our minds. Ong states that “writing is a technology that restructures thought” the main thing he tries to show us is writing is a technology and it changes the way we think. For example, reading on the internet is different than reading on a printed page online reading were scanning looking for the main points, and for a printed page were taking our time reading and annotating. I think we are impatient when it comes to finding information online we are quick and want the answers now. Ong says that writing changes us without awareness and changes human consciousness. He talks about orality. Orality makes the community, because speech always makes us interact to more than one person. For example, in class when we share our stories it makes you learn other people experiences and it gives you the insight into orality and literacy understanding. Overall, I found Ong article to be very helpful in understanding oral cultures and the importance of stressing your thinking ability.

Carolyn Pena Blog Post Week 2

On page 143 in “Orality and Literacy,” Walter J. Ong writes “The reader must also fictionalize the writer. When my friend reads my letter, I may be in an entirely different frame of mind from when I wrote it. Indeed, I may very well be dead. For a text to convey its message, it does not matter whether the author is dead or alive”. The reason this part stood out to me is that I never realized how many times I actually did this while reading.  When I look back at myself reading I would always have to try to fictionalize the writer so it could help me get a better idea of what I am reading. Another thing that Ong wrote was how “the writer may be dead or alive but that still does not matter for the text to convey a message to the readers”. Writers try to convey their message as direct as they can get so they can get their points across to the reader. Writers have to think ahead about any questions that a reader might have and therefore tries to cover all the questions that can possibly come up. Another thing is about the “different frame of mind” and how quickly the mind of a writer can change. I say this because I have met writers that published their books and said that they wish they could’ve changed this or that about this book but could no longer because it’s published. At the end of the day, we still fictionalize what we want about the writer although he might be dead or alive, it does not matter because it does not change the message they wrote.

 

Ong, Walter J. “Orality and Literacy” in The Book History Reader. eds. David Finkelstein, Alistair McCleery. Routledge, 2006

Brieya Walker 9/4/2018 WEEK 2 Walter Ong, Orality and Literacy: the Technologizing of the Word

This week’s blog is a reflection on Walter Ong’s ORALITY AND LITERACY Writing restructures consciousness. In the passage he states, “Secondly, Plato’s Socrates urges, writing destroys memory. Those who use writing will become forgetful, relying on an external resource for what they lack in internal resources. Writing weakens the mind.” (page 135) This statement caught my attention because I feel the complete opposite about writing and I think many others do as well. I believe writing something down instills anything I need to learn in into my brain more efficiently than just memorizing what I was verbally told. Writing is me making the conscious decision to write down the information I want my brain to retain. Furthermore, he makes the comparison of parents feeling the same way about calculators. They make the argument that calculators weaken the mind and dismisses it of the work that keeps it strong. I agree with this statement because of my personal experiences. Growing up, in elementary school I learned how to do everything with a pen and paper and had to show my work doing math problems. As I graduated to middle school, calculators took over and having to show full work for these same math problems were not mandatory and all I had to do was use the calculator for my answers. In the long run, this resulted in me not remembering how to manually do the process of long division, fractions, etc., second guessing how to do the same functions of what I was taught. Therefore, I do agree that tools like calculators can weaken the mind, but the process of writing does not.

 

Ong, Walter. ·Orality, Literacy, and Modern Media….. In David Crowley and Paul Heyer, Communication in History: Technology Culture, Society. Third Edition. New York: Longman, 1999, pp. 135.

Frida Barolli Post for week two 9/6

For this weeks post I am reflecting on Walter Ong “ORALITY AND LITERACY Writing restructures consciousness”. This reading especially stood out to me. “Secondly, Plato’s Socrates urges, writing destroys memory. Those who use writing will become forgetful, relying on an external resource for what they lack in internal resources. Writing weakens the mind. Today, parents and others fear that pocket calculators provide an external resomce for what ought to be the internal resource of memorized multiplication tables.” All my life my parents have always taught me different strategies on studying. They were not allowed to go to school but they were fascinated with education. Although they were only allowed to go up to 8th grade, they are such intelligent people. My parents grew up extremely poor but my grandparents made sure my parents studied. They had no paper, so they studied on napkins. They memorized there history, there math and writing skills on napkins at home. My parents have always told my sisters and I the more you write the better you’ll understand what your studying. I was always a math struggler but when I was little my mom use to sit with me and she would teach me how to do math problems over and over again by writing them down. If you write things down using your own words it’ll stick better in your memory. Writing, in my own experience has been the best strategy to help me with school, work and just life in general. I disagree with Platos statement because writing is very crucial in everyday life, it is the key in life. It may not be everyones favorite thing to do, but it is something that you hold onto for the future. The human brain cannot remember everything. My parents grew up without calculators and they tried to teach my sisters and I how to do math without calculators as well. They can do math in there brain as fast as a calculator.

Marisa Brincat’s Post for 09/10

“But even with a listener to stimulate and ground your thought, the bits and pieces of your thought cannot be preserved into jotted notes. How could you ever call back to mind what you had so laboriously worked out? The only answer is: Think memorable thoughts.” (Ong, 66)

This quote really stood out to me because it touches on the concept of time. The way that I translated it was that even if you have a person listening to the words coming from your lips, the idea cannot be savored from just some bits and pieces that you may recall. The only way to really remember your ideas is to think memorably and make it something worth while. I thought that this quote was really deep because time is so limited and we all have so many big ideas. Even when we have a lot going on in life, it could be hard to remember all the thoughts and ideas that pass through your mind. In order to make your thoughts ones to remember, you must think memorably. I thought this quote was so beautifully written and it really hit hard due to the fact that we must make all of our important ideas count.

Work Cited:

Ong, Walter. ·Orality, Literacy, and Modern Media….. In David Crowley and Paul Heyer, Communication in History: Technology Culture, Society. Third Edition. New York: Longman, 1999, pp.60-67